Archive for category Art
Tower of London
Posted by FuzzyGamer in Art, Pictures, Random Thoughts on 2011/09/27

“But sometimes, no matter how carefully you plan your playlist, there is no right track for what awaits you.”
Darwin film "too controversial" for a release in the States
Charles Darwin film ‘too controversial for religious America’
A British film about Charles Darwin has failed to find a US distributor because his theory of evolution is too controversial for American audiences, according to its producer.
Creation, starring Paul Bettany, details Darwin’s “struggle between faith and reason” as he wrote On The Origin of Species. It depicts him as a man who loses faith in God following the death of his beloved 10-year-old daughter, Annie.
The film was chosen to open the Toronto Film Festival and has its British premiere on Sunday. It has been sold in almost every territory around the world, from Australia to Scandinavia.
However, US distributors have resolutely passed on a film which will prove hugely divisive in a country where, according to a Gallup poll conducted in February, only 39 per cent of Americans believe in the theory of evolution.
Holy fuck. If the rest of the world didn’t think Americans were out their minds, then this – blocking a film because it deals with a historical figure who described one of the most influential scientific theories – will not help in the least. I’m curious as to the exact reasons that the Religious Right is opposed to this movie: if your faith can be shaken by 120 minutes of cute Paul Bettany and his hot wife Jennifer Connelly (playing Darwin and wife Emma, respectively), then maybe that says more about your faith than it does about the movie. And if evolution to you is as much a fairy tale as the Bible is to me, well then, you can just look at the film as a story of a confused and troubled man suffering from the death of his daughter. Big whoop.
This debacle brings to mind a somewhat related bit of controversy that recently swept the nation: the President’s speech to school-children. Now, that is old news, but I’d still like to comment on it. Unlike some people, I was perfectly fine with parents keeping their kids home, telling them not to listen to the Big Bad President or being prepared with a rebuttal after the speech was made. I actually think that that was a very good thing to happen. America’s Right helped emphasize a point I’ve been making for years, and that is of personal responsibility: if you don’t want your kids brainwashed by MTV, the liberal media, evolution-spewing “science” teachers, violent movies or whatever, stand up and ACT LIKE A PARENT. Which is what the Right finally did. I’m somewhat disappointed that they would pick this time to do it, but that’s their choice. It’s actually good parenting to talk to your children, find out what they were taught in school that day and reconcile that new-found knowledge with whatever baseline you happen to adhere to. Maybe the Religious Right should take the same stance with Creation: let your kids watch it, then at home explain that it was all horse-shit, non-sense and contained about as much truth as a Harry Potter flick.
Sunday morning blogging
Posted by FuzzyGamer in Art, Books, Comics, Food, Music, Pictures, Random Thoughts, Sci-Fi on 2009/09/13
Flickr
Found this amazing Flickr user, Deborah Chen, through a random search: was looking for “bionic bunny”, stumbled on some of her photos. Great photos, excellent composition, interesting colors, beautiful models (photographer herself included, of course). Just about the only gripe I have with her work (aside from wishing I could do something similar) is that sometimes the 1970′s-coloring is overdone. Here’s an example of where I think it’s appropriate, Argonaut, and here’s one where I think the photo was fine without the effect, Castro.
PostSecret for 9/13/2009
I wish I was there for my cat.
Get Fuzzy
The brilliance that is Get Fuzzy is sometimes hard to describe to the non-believers. Below is a comic that shouldn’t need much explanation. Sunday edition comics are large, so click for the full image.
Random thought
There is no such thing as “life”. If we’re looking for anything in this universe, it should be beauty. Possibly more on this topic later.
Fin
Well, anyway, enough internet for this morning, laundry’s done, I can finally go get some dim sum and read.
—
Currently listening to: Gomez, “Bring It On: 10th Anniversary Collector’s Edition”.
Currently reading: “The Dreaming Void”, by Peter F. Hamilton
Monday night…
Posted by FuzzyGamer in Art, Pictures on 2009/08/16
Empty bottle of beer and nothing on TV
Foray into macro photography
Posted by FuzzyGamer in Art, Pictures, Random on 2008/10/13
Two weeks ago I ordered some Nikon-compatible, third-party lens extension tubes. Damn, these things took forever to get here. I just got the beat-up package in the mail yesterday. Of course, they were being shipped from Hong Kong (bought through eBay, 10$ for the tubes and shipping), but I still reserve the right to complain.
I tried to use these yesterday and was woefully disappointed to find that although they fit perfectly well between the camera and my Nikkor 50mm 1.4f lens, my D80 just wouldn’t take a picture. I’d push the shutter-release button and… nothing would happen. I went to bed soon after, tired and mildly irritated.
Today, I actually figured out that to get the D80 to take a photo with these tubes, you need to set the camera to full-manual mode (designated by M). Silly me. So, today I actually got to take some of those macro photos. Considering that I didn’t really have a good subject, they still turned out not-sucky. I’ve uploaded a few images here.
Here’s some photos of the tubes and what they do. Keep in mind that there are actually three tubes of increasing sizes, but in the photos below I have them all hooked up together, to maximize the effect.

This is the lens I am currently using.

This is the lens with the tubes attached.

These are the tubes themselves. Notice that they’re empty – they have no optical elements – their whole purpose is to move the lens away from the focal plane.
A note on using cheap extension tubes
If you go the eBay route and buy extension tubes for 4$, understand what you are getting. These tubes will not allow you to control your lens from the camera, it will become a fully-manual lens. This means that the focus and aperture will have to be set manually. Also, metering will probably be disabled. I understand that the higher-range Nikon’s can meter even when using these tubes, but my D80 cannot.
In my case, I’ve had some difficulty with a completely manual lens and camera, but it’s not a big deal. The main reason for that is that the lens I am using was originally (1986?) designed to be completely manual, so it has the focus and aperture controls on it.
The lens I used to take these photos (18-200mm VR), however, is a more recent lens that only offers CPU-controlled aperture control. The downside of this is that when the lens is not connected to a camera, it “defaults” to its smallest aperture. What this means is that if I want to use the VR lens, I have to look at a scene through a tiny hole, making it harder to focus (the dimmer the image, the harder it is to tell when parts are in focus or not). With my 50mm lens, I set the aperture to a whopping 1.4f, focus on the subject, downshift to 16f and take the photo (for greater depth of field).
The upside of the whole thing is that I can spend 10$ on these tubes and have the option of macro photography. I could have gone all the way with the “official” solution from Nikon, but theirs isn’t perfect either: the rings Nikon sells do not support auto-focus (and that’s at their extortionist prices). Kenko sells rings that do support auto-focus, but they’re still expensive, costing 170$ for the same increase in focal distance. I’m not moving to 100% macro photography (and if I was, I’d just get a dedicated macro lens), so the 10$ solution is fine with me.
Well, it’s almost fine with me. I’m thinking of trying out this reversing ring. It basically allows me to flip the lens and attach it “backwards”. We’ll see how that goes. It’s also around 10$ on eBay.
Of course, at some point (read: when I can afford to), I’ll probably just get a dedicated macro lens and call it a day. But, until then, here’s to cheap experimenting.
That is awesome!
Posted by FuzzyGamer in Art, Blog, Pictures, Random on 2007/11/11
I really love this idea: Traveling Toys.
The Piglet photos are my favorite.
Artistic Terrorism
Posted by FuzzyGamer in Art, Terrorism, Writing on 2007/08/08
I got myself a Magic 8-Ball two weeks and have been having quite a… ball with it. Horrific pun fully intended. …anyway. I’m quite lazy. Hell, I wrote an AI script that writes blogs for me, that’s how lazy I am. And the thing is the smartest bot ever, capable of penning Pulitzer-worthy blogs, but does anyone notice? No! Does anyone care? Of course not! I’m stuck in this dump, writing entries for an idiot with too much time and no life. All he ever does is work work work. Ooh, look at me, I work at Microsoft, I have to neglect my ‘side’ projects. Asshole.
Ahem. Anyway. So he― I mean, I got myself a Magic 8-Ball, but the whole thing about shaking it got so damn boring. So I hooked it up to some motors, posed a webcam over it and automated the whole shebang. It’s very simple now: I write up a list of questions, push a button, go to make myself a sandwich and by the time I’m back, all the questions are answered. I even programmed the system to note when the 8-Ball throws out one of those idiotic “ask again” signs and doesn’t mark the question as answered, but comes back to it after all the others have been asked. It’s really quite an ingenious thing. So, there I am, eating a sandwich and examining the output. And I see a strange pattern: the freaking 8-Ball is spot on! It’s always right! I ask if it’ll rain in 28 minutes, it says ‘yes’, and lo and behold it pours! It’s really working! It tells the future!
What would you do in such a situation? Ask if you’ll meet the love of your life in the next year/month/week/hour? Bah, you’re an idiot! Stop thinking so small! What did I do, you ask? Well, isn’t it obvious? I hooked my blogging AI up to it. The AI is already connected to a vast array of online research tools: dictionaries, thesauruses, encyclopedias, Wikipedia, MSDN (supporting my employer, you understand), CNN, BBC, whatever the hell else it wants and I approve. It asked for Playboy and People a few weeks ago. Of course I wouldn’t allow such trash on my computer, I only let him use the Playboy feed. So, anyway, with most of the non-pornographic internet backing it up (Playboy is to pornography as Hershey’s is to chocolate: if you’re looking for the real thing, keep on walking, Jack) the AI is asking the 8-Ball an unending queue of 20-Questions. About the future. It’s not an easy task to paint an accurate picture of the next decade, particularly when the answers are binary, but he’s pretty far along. He’s already got the major events down and is now concentrating on the small details. Last I checked, he was going for the third week of March, 2013. He’s got the initials of the next-next President of the United States. I don’t particularly care about the 2012 election, though. Or the 2008, aside from having my suspicions confirmed: America elects an old, white, religious male. Surprise!
But, anyhow, let’s skip the small stuff and focus on the important aspects of the future: in just under a year the United States will come under a widespread terrorist attack. There is good news, though, so don’t just dash off to buy a second Uzi. The terrorists are using art. Yes, art. We are under attack from art. Now, don’t start straining your unmyelinated neurons, might hurt yourself. I’ll explain everything.
Art is “an action, an object, or a collection of actions and objects created with the intention of transmitting emotions and/or ideas”. Simple definition, right? Some guy was feeling happy, wrote some symbols on a piece of paper, you looked at those symbols and felt happy: that’s art. Well, art terrorism is just that, only now it’s not happiness or sadness or whatever. No, now it’s slightly different. Here’s an example: the first known piece of terrorist art was painted onto a billboard on the side of a busy road; every person who saw the billboard had an irrational desire to kick his brother out of a car. It didn’t matter if the person didn’t have a brother, or the brother wasn’t in the car, or even if they weren’t driving, but were rather walking along the road: every person wanted to kick their brother out of a car upon seeing that particular picture. And quite a few did! A woman driving an SUV kicked her brother, who was in the passenger seat next to her, right out onto the road. Another incident occurred when two brothers were riding in the backseat of a car: one brother saw the advertisement first and attempted to kick his brother into oncoming traffic. One woman succeeded in kicking her brother out of the car, only to realize that he was the driver. Hilarity ensued.
Artistic terrorism didn’t stop there. Not even close to it. Some artistic terrorist replaced the DVD of an in-flight movie on a transatlantic flight with a DVD that passed onto the viewers a strong need to spit at others. The DVD got stuck on repeat mode and, upon arrival in London, two men and one woman were listed in critical condition as a result of extreme dehydration. Another terrorist plot was much less damaging: the walls of a conference room in a Fortune 500 company (I won’t say which one, but it rhymes with Wicrosoft) were painted a shade of yellow that is very hard to distinguish from their usual wall color and acts primarily on the subconscious level. In this case, the paint persuaded everyone present in a rather a large meeting that they were, on some level, pugs: the attendees turned around three times before sitting down, snored uncontrollably (even when wide awake) and found each other irresistibly cute and huggable.
One incident which caught my eye occurred at MoMA, the Museum of Modern Art in New York City. An exhibition by an until-then unknown artist drew nationwide news coverage when one of the pieces, a water-color painting, resulted in over three hundred divorces over the course of a week. Patrons were often heard exclaiming something along the lines of “that’s pretty good, but― I’m leaving you, Meredith, take the house, I don’t care anymore― the foreground colors produce quite a menacing effect.” The artist was questioned by the FBI but they concluded that he was merely a “loser hippy.” The mayor of New York City invited the artist to what he referred to as his “bachelor pad” after attending the exhibition with his now-ex-wife. I doubt that this was an act of terrorism.
I saved my favorite act of terrorism for last: a programming genius in Redmond, Washington, devised a devastating attack in the form of an easy to draw scribble. This scribble imparted in the observer a feeling of extreme happiness, a desire to share this joy with the world and, having shared, to fight back against a world incapable of accepting or understanding this wonderful gift. In short, every one who saw the scribble got the urge to draw it elsewhere and then went on a spree punching strangers, all the while humming a happy tune and smiling a Cheshire grin. The scribble went on to infect Seattle and neighboring towns, but stopped soon after, for lack of a high enough population density to sustain the reaction. It also didn’t help that the rains kept washing the scribble off most publicly-accessible areas that were effected.
The Magic 8-Ball also went on to make predictions about the second coming of Jesus and me having a life. You know, maybe this thing doesn’t actually work.
Celebration of Light
Posted by FuzzyGamer in Art, Music, YouTube on 2007/08/05
Sorry about the quality, but it’s YouTube and the uploaders are idiots. This is the best video I’ve seen so far.
Pride and Prejudice
Posted by FuzzyGamer in Art, Movies, Random Thoughts on 2007/04/26
‘Pride and Prejudice’ was on last night, and I watched about 3 minutes of it. It’s a difficult task, you see, to follow any work of Jane Austen’s, but this particular version held my attention for a whole 3 minutes! How is this accomplished, you ask? Three reasons: Keira Knightley, Donald Sutherland and Rosamund Pike. While watching, I realized, finally, why it is that this movie and other similar films bother me: it’s a movie about a bunch of gardeners. I don’t mean ‘gardener’ in quite the literal sense, just a metaphor, of sorts: these are people who spend their lives tending to and pruning the family tree. True, it’s a fairly lame metaphor, but I don’t have anything else. It’s true, however, since the entire film focuses on the painfully vain motivations of the main characters to marry, or have their children marry, just the right person. The entire story is about planning weddings. I’d rather watch paint dry!
Super Columbine Massacre RPG!
Posted by FuzzyGamer in Art, Gaming, Politics, YouTube on 2007/01/05
Apparently, this is a rather old game (it came out in 2005) but I haven’t heard about it until just today seeing an article on GamePolitics. Yes, this is an RPG (role playing game), with the look of old Zelda games, that is based on the Columbine shootings. You can download it for free on the developer’s website. I’m not even going to try and get it while I’m at work, but I’ll give it a spin when I get home. Anyhow.
I haven’t played this game yet, obviously. And it would seem that a lot of people haven’t played it, but have found reason enough in the game’s subject to scream their heads off. People are complaining that the game addresses a tragic event and the developer is making money off the deaths of the Columbine victims. Obviously video game critics are pointing toward this game as yet another thing that is eroding the moral fabric of our culture, or whatever their metaphor is this week.
Moving past the biggest mistake the opponents have done, and that is not seeing for themselves quite what the game is, they seem to be hypocritical in their choice of targets. Making a game about the killings of 13 individuals is immoral and should be outlawed, but the countless films on the topic of World War II and the Holocaust are perfectly acceptable? Should there be a longer time between the act and the semi-fictionalized retelling of the story? Columbine happened in 1999. The attacks of 9/11 occurred in 2001 and there have already been made at least 3 major films, profiting the studios from the deaths of 2,973 people. Oh, wait, maybe it’s about numbers: WWII claimed over 60 million lives, 9/11 saw 2,973 deaths (and 24 missing and presumed dead) while Columbine is “only” 13. How many award-winning WWII games are there? How many of these put the gamer in German uniform and have them run around shooting Allied soldiers? There’s a WWII game that pits Americans against the Japanese in direct combat. It’s very popular in Japan.
What is it about this game that makes the critics foam at the mouth at its very mention? Does the game reward violence? Does it humanize the inhuman monsters of Harris and Klebold? Does it attempt to justify their actions? I’ll know soon enough.
Here’s a trailer/response video from YouTube.
Softcore porn
Posted by FuzzyGamer in Art, Games, Rant, TV on 2006/11/03
Just watched a trailer video for Dead or Alive: Xtreme 2 and I’ve got some opinions (yes, I’m an opinionated ass).
Ever heard of Dead or Alive? It’s this series of fighter games that famous for their well-endowed fighting beauties. And, while fighting has been emphasized to a fair extent, most people will agree that the games’ main features are the female characters. Somewhere, there was a full department dedicated to coding breast physics. Seriously! In fact, in this new game, each breast has its own physics.
Now, I’m the last person to say that games should be sterile entities made of bright colored blocks chasing other bright colored blocks in a blue maze. In fact, I’m fully supportive of laws to restrict Mature (not to be confused with Adult Only) game sales to underage, unsupervised idiots for the sole reason that it will allow developers to cram more “offensive” content into the games. But some of what Team Ninja (the makers of the series) is doing is just too much. I played the demo of Dead or Alive 4 and I gotta say that while the femmes fatales are breathtaking and not lacking in any department, the game is a brilliant fighter and would have captured my attention just the same if all the characters were your usual stock males from the Mortal Kombat fame. But, from what I’ve seen of the 8 minute trailer, Dead or Alive: Xtreme 2 is softcore porn with the pretense of being a video game. The whole trailer is nothing but nearly-naked CG characters running around on the beach, playing on a blow-up Orca and tossing crabs back into the ocean (where did that one come from, really?).
If you’re making a video game and sexual or violent content makes sense to be present there, go nuts. When you’re making a game about inner-city gang warfare, I expect to see plenty of violence. I also would like some sort of indication that these people aren’t asexual worms.
History is repeating itself, actually. It just shifted mediums: from TV to video games.
I think the kind of censorship that existed in American television in the 1950′s is offensive to common sense and logic: a married couple had to be shown to sleep in separate beds and the toilet was as hard to find on screen as WMD’s in Iraq. Are the networks working under the assumption that their target audience consists of people who are unaware of intimacy and have never had to use the bathroom? I hear “I Love Lucy” is really popular with the hour-old-infants crowd. You can’t just ignore something because it might offend a few people. In this case, you can’t just ignore something because you got it into your head that showing something that everyone has seen and knows about is, for whatever reason, an immoral and obscene act. And who the hell is offended when people even talk about going to the bathroom? You do it. You know that everyone else does. Everyone on the planet, with the exception of single-celled organisms (correct me if I’m wrong on this one, Taty) and Bonsai Kittens goes to the bathroom.
How about this: instead of making reality TV, trying making TV that feels real. Toss away the “reality” shows where a dozen pissed off, unusually beautiful and very confrontational people compete for an idiotic prize. Try something that shows real life, with all of its imperfections and flaws. I’m sick and tired of Armani-clad civil servants solving murder cases by interpolating grain-sized evidence to paint the crystal-clear picture of the crime scene. I’m bored of watching a top-notch government unit battle terrorists for 24 non-stop hours while never needing to use the bathroom and always staying within the PG-rated swearing rules of “damn it, we’re running out of time!” How about “Shit, Tony, I gotta go take a piss before we hit the bad guys. You know how a full bladder can spoil an entire operation.” Yes, I expect reality out of a show that jumped the shark a few seasons ago. But you gotta start somewhere. Why is it that violence is perfectly acceptable (thankfully) but a bad word, the kind that daddy says after pounding away four shots, is completely and utterly out of order? Sorry, I shouldn’t try to draw this already-drawn-out post into the entirely too-easy bash-post about American culture.
If you want to take a look at the game, here’s an 18+ (surprised?) trailer. It doesn’t actually have any nudity in it or anything, but… Anyhow, watch it, if only to ask yourself “how can these people, with an entire department dedicated to breast physics, still manage to screw it up so bad?” And they do.
BTW, this is not the 8 minute, 400 MB trailer that I got from the XBOX Marketplace. This trailer shows more games and is quite shorter, clocking in at only 2 minutes. Though it still manages to clearly pass along the basic idea of the game. If you can, download or view the high-def version. Really, you ought to.








