Archive for category Swimming
Vanilla Cons
Posted by FuzzyGamer in Swimming, Writing on 2007/07/31
The Pro Club has four pools: kiddie pool, lap pool and two general purpose pools. You’d think that the people in the lap pool would be free to, well, do laps. But no. We get everyone trying to muscle in on our turf, from the talkers, people who just walk laps and talk; to little kids, when they should probably be in either of the multi-purpose pools or, at the very least, in the kiddie pool. The pools are even labeled as such. But I guess some people can’t read.
Others won’t read, like an Eastern-European father and son. The son is about four or five and the father is an asshole. Here’s the picture: the son is ‘swimming’ laps in the left-most lane in the lap pool, while the father walks alongside him, out of the pool. The father is your typical too-competitive weirdo. He’s telling his son the proper way to swim, all the time ‘inspiring’ the kid by making fun of the other swimmers: “look at her, she can’t even swim, she’s almost drowning, you can swim better than her”, “that four-eyes over there is giving you dirty looks, show him your kick-ass doggy-paddle”. This is annoying to other swimmers, but they just assume that the dynamic duo will be gone tomorrow. Oh, how wrong they are.
The next day the father and the son are back, and they’ve brought their friends. Seems the father loved the pool, as well as the freedom to yell, so much, he told other Eastern-European friends of his. Now there are three pairs of boys and their fathers, all of them doing laps in the left-most lane, while the fathers walk up and down the side of the pool, yelling at their kids about this or that. Thankfully for the ear-drums of everyone involved, they sometimes pause and talks amongst themselves, catching up on the news from the old country and funny videos they found on YouTube. Go figure.
This continues for the rest of the week. Suddenly, over the weekend, the loud-mouths are gone. Oh, the joy! It seems that the silent treatment has worked, the group decided to take their activities elsewhere. On Monday, much to everyone’s surprise, the Eastern-Europeans are back. Full-force, so to speak: there are now 6 kids doing laps in the two left lanes. Their fathers, however, have decided to save their voices: they only yell intermittent ‘words of inspiration’ from the lawn chairs they set up on the left side of the pool. No one knows where they got the lawn chairs.
Then, the unthinkable happens, things actually get worse. The Eastern-Europeans have an almost permanent claim on the left side of the lap pool: from just after 5 PM until the pool closes at 11 PM, they are there, talking, yelling and hassling the other swimmers. They’ve moved from irritating to all-out rude remarks. Sometimes, they even splash other swimmers, but that only happened a few times, when the issue of the lane usage came up. The men seem to take their lane ownership quite seriously, and splash anyone who might try and challenge them.
While all of this is happening, this rise to power of the six Eastern-European men, a separate power is developing in the right-most lane: Keefer Schulze and his wife are teaching their kids to swim. The family comes to the pool around 7 PM for a few hours every day during the same time as the Eastern-Europeans. Soon, Keefer works out a system with other swimmers that allows his family to use the right-most lane exclusively.
At first, the Eastern-Europeans and Keefer go about their own activities, largely ignorant of one another. The only reason that the Eastern-Europeans noticed the family in the right lane was when, once again, a swimmer from one of the middle lanes tried to use one of the two left-most lanes. At the time the lane was occupied by a boy and his mother. The mother was lounging at one end of the pool, not swimming, so the swimmer decided that it was fair to share the lane with the boy. This act of ‘aggression’ caught the attention of the Eastern-Europeans. Some wanted to yell at the swimmer, others wanted to splash him. But one very cunning man realized that to be in power, they didn’t need to yell, or to splash, or to outnumber their foes, they just need the will to do what the other guy wouldn’t. It’s not clear what they did to the swimmer, but he never ventured past the middle lane after that.
After a while, the Eastern-Europeans gained reputation and decided to come after Keefer, to take his lane. They come to the right side of the pool and begin splashing Keefer’s family. They know Keefer is tough, so to show that they mean business, one of the men dives cannonball into the pool, soaking Keefer’s son from head to toe. The men tell him that they want his lane. Keefer looks at the bored faces of his family, and he shows these men of will what will really is: he cannonballs into the pool, splashing his family. He then proceeds to splash all of the Eastern-Europeans.
After his family is dried off, he goes after the rest of the Eastern-Europeans: he splashes their kids, he splashes their wives, he throws water balloons at their parents and their parents’ friends, he throws water balloons at the houses they live in and the stores they work in, he throws water balloons at the people that owe them money.
And like that, he’s gone. Nobody’s ever seen him since. He becomes a myth, a spook story parents tell their children in the pool: “misbehave, and Keefer Schulze will splash you.”
Some say the Schulze family left the state, some say Keefer changed jobs and moved to a different town, yet others say that they have a pool in their new house. But one thing is certain, if Keefer Schulze is still around, he’s not going to risk being splashed ever again.
Work, the pool, 'Fracture' and McCormick & Schmick's
Posted by FuzzyGamer in Food, Movies, Random Thoughts, Swimming on 2007/04/21
Today was a successful day which first started with me not waking up at 1 pm. It then got better by me resolving 2/3 of my bugs. Yay.
After much time-wasting in meetings and so on, I finally had a chance to go for a swim. Finally, because I missed going yesterday. That whole waking-up-at-1pm-thing really screws you up, you know.
Now, there are a number of swimmers at the pool. I will attempt to define those classes in a nice bullet-list.
- Splashers – these are people who, for one reason or another, feel the need to splash water 3 lanes in each direction. Maybe it’s something about marking their territory. Or they’re trying to prove that while the rest of us are at the pool to waste time, they are the true practitioners, and as such exhibit outmost contempt for the common man, demonstrating it by unceasing water-shows.
- Freakin’ bullets – these people traverse the length of the pool in the blink of an eye, leaving the chums in their wake, to sink or swim in the resulting tidal waves. These people are sometimes splashers, particularly at either end of the lane, switching directions by propelling their hairless bodies out of the water and splashing down not unlike a nuclear submarine from ‘The Hunt for Red October’.
- Damn slow pokes – these people are trying out for the Olympics. The sloth Olympics, I think. I manage to swim 8 laps in the time it takes this gold-medalist to complete even one. I think they’re paddling really slow in place, only moving forward for a lack of options. And I certainly don’t know what they’re trying to accomplish.
- The busy assholes – these people don’t stop. Ever. Not even for you to politely ask them if they will mind sharing a lane. I think they’ve been in the pool since last November, doing laps and not caring what in the hell is going on around. Yes, ignorance is bliss, but acknowledge the outside world once in a while, if only not to come crashing head-first into a fellow swimmer. These are often splashers and sometimes bullets. Be weary of the busy asshole: sharing a lane with them is an exercise in patience and self-restraint. When they’re not busy overtaking you or stirring up tidal waves at the ends of the pool, they are hogging most of the lane. Sort of hard to see where you are when your head is in the water 80% of the time.
- The twitching idiots – these mental giants have deduced that the proper swimming form is one resembling a car-crash victim: their limbs can often be seen at impossible angles and their arms seem to be locked in at 90 degrees. The stranger the body looks during a swim, the better. These are often times splashers. Seriously, how would they not be with all those arms flying everywhere?
- The talkers – this illusive creatures appear in pairs, normally. These are people who occupy the same lane but are rarely seen actually using it. They are found at the ends, standing around and talking. I am not sure what about, I try not to stick around, but it’s apparently very interesting and can only be discussed in the pool. They do not possess particularly annoying swimming traits, as they almost never swim. One begins to wonder if they even know how…
After the pool I went back to work to finish up the bugs I checked in earlier. Skipping past the boring parts, I then went to watch ‘Fracture’.
This was the first movie I’ve seen in quite a while. It’s a fairly curious thriller. Ryan Gosling plays a young hotshot assistant district attorney, trying to convict Anthony Hopkins’ character of attempted murder. See, Hopkins shot his wife in the head (she’s alive but in a coma) and now it’s up to Gosling to build a case from what seems to be a fairly straight-forward matter. Rosamund Pike stars as Gosling’s soon-to-be boss and lover. While her performance can be missed if you were to blink, she’s delightful and is one of the reasons I decided to see this film. That, and it fit my schedule, but moving on. A film about weak-points has quite a few of its own, but that’s probably just my perception. That and the fact that I’ve watched one too many CSI-type shows: the surprises were largely predictable and I noticed the major plot point at the first moment it appeared, close to an hour before the rest of the characters catch on. In this respect, the film is very much like ‘Manchurian Candidate’: while great on its own, there’s not much new that I didn’t see in the trailer, infer on my own before ever going to the theater or see from a mile away as a plot point.
Afterwards I made my way to McCormick & Schmick’s, a seafood restaurant in the same building as the movie theater (Lincoln Square). This place is quickly becoming a favorite of mine. I have been there twice (for dinner) and was very satisfied both times, equally by the presentation, the quality of the food and the service. Of course, I do end up spending a minimum of 50$ every time I’m there, but it’s worth it. Having tried the oyster sampler last time, today I focused on the Kusshi Oysters (Deep Bay, British Columbia). These are a smaller, but sweeter, oyster variety that is pure heaven on the half-shell. For the entrée I had Wahoo (Kona Coast, Hawaii), “Oven Roasted with Penn Cove Mussels in a Red Curry Sauce”. A hard and somewhat stringy fish on rice, with breath-taking curry and mussels. Just “wow”. Can’t say anything else. For dessert, I once again went with the upside-down apple pie with ice cream. The whole thing is served on a plate decorated with fine flour and caramel dribbled liberally. Yum!
McCormick & Schmick’s is quickly becoming a favorite of mine and I am determined to celebrate every big, and little, achievement there. But no more often than once every two weeks. Not the fact that it’s semi-expensive. It’s certainly not because of their dish sizes: it’s not a lot of food, that’s why I am able to try an appetizer and a desert in addition to the entrée. The reasoning here is that this is something of a special place and I’m going to keep it that way.
This blabbering post is brought to you by the soundtrack for “Eyes Wide Shut”, a gorgeous arrangement of mostly instrumental music.
An exercise in futility?
Posted by FuzzyGamer in Random Thoughts, Sci-Fi, Swimming on 2007/03/17
This is a bit of a stretch in hypotheticals, but what the hell. Actually, I think there’s a point in there somewhere, but it’s not very important. Anyhow.
Scenario: in 50 years scientists discover a way to extend the average life span to 500 years. That is, barring the usual causes of death such as falling off a cliff or confusing a “High Voltage” sign for “Men’s Room”. And I’m not sure how they can know that it’s 500 years, given that no one at this point has lived that long, but that little tid-bit is folded into the hypothetical nature of this exercise. So, people can live to be 500 years old, on average, if they go through some complicated procedure.
Of course, this will have an indescribable impact on our society. I can sit here all day imagining the effects of this miracle, but I just don’t have that kind of time. So, I’m going to focus on a very specific example: prison sentences.
Imagine a murderer who is sentenced today to 200 years in prison. He killed four people from three separate families. In 50 years, the scientists make the discovery of (relative) longevity. Here’s the tricky part: the man is in prison, still alive. If he can stay alive for 150 years, he’ll be free! Do we allow him to go through the life-extending procedure? On what grounds can we keep it away from him? Is it because the judge decided that while the murderer deserves to die in prison, to illustrate the sever nature of the crime he specified an obscenely long prison term? Do the families of the victims have a say in this? Since the murderer is serving out a specific number of years, to punish him they might try to block the procedure. What if he was serving a life term? Do the families have a valid case, for the same reason of “I meant he should die in prison”, to force the state’s hand in performing the scientific procedure despite the man’s wishes? What if some victims’ families want vengeance and others have learned forgiveness? How about if there are no living family members? Does the state pursue the “meaning” of law and not the specific wording? In the same example as above, what happens if the sentence isn’t 200 years but life? How about looking a bit further into the future: this breakthrough suggests that in future methods will be discovered to extend human life even further. Can the families of the victims legally keep a murderer alive for an infinite time? If today we can extend life span to 500 years, immortality is just around the corner.
This is the kind of thing I consider while doing laps in the pool. There’s not much else to do and I’ve noticed that I actually swim faster if I can focus on something external, be it the book I’m reading, a specific problem at work or an all-too-strange idea I’m kicking around.
Oh, and, almost as an afterthought, here’s the irrelevant point in all of this. Of course, the ultimate point is the intellectual exercise, but, as is often the case, I like to finish a blog entry by concluding that something about the world around us is just plain stupid.
It really puzzles when I hear a person being sentenced to 100 years in prison or four life sentences. What kind of logic went into that decision? If you’re contemplating a prison sentence longer than 50 to 70 years (depending on the person), simply give them life. Similarly, why bother with multiple life sentences? Unless you believe in reincarnation and are willing to imprison the worm or the pig that the criminal has become, multiple life sentences are idiotic.
For those who actually see something interesting in this exercise, you can read up on the following subjects:
- The Singularity – the idea born out of science fiction, but now rearing its ugly or beautiful head into the world around us. The concept is that of exponentially accelerating technological innovations and the inconceivable future that follows.
- Doomsday Argument – a lovely concept I stumbled upon while researching a paper in college, the Doomsday Argument uses the population statistics to determine the likely life-span of humanity.
- Jonathan Pollard, link and link – this is a case of a spy who was sentenced to life for a crime that, in other cases, warranted a sentence of usually under 10 years. Take a look at the second link which compares sentences of US spies and whether the espionage was carried out for an Ally or an Enemy. Of the convicted spies only 3, other than Pollard, received life sentences, and each of them spied for an Enemy state, while Pollard was working with an American Ally.
High-point of my day
Posted by FuzzyGamer in Quotes, Random, Swimming, Work on 2007/02/08
This is a short quote that needs a few explanations and mentions and doesn’t really amount to much in the end. Enjoy.
Prashant is a temporary Dev-Lead on my team, while Tad is on paternity leave.
A bug I am working on right now has been pushed into the next milestone, which is not something you want to do, and certainly not something that you want to have caused.
I am wearing sandals, not my regular shoes, because it’s 7pm and I always wear my sandals after going to the pool. They’re comfier.
Prashant: You look jobless.
Me: Do you know something I don’t?
So, I’m not sure what Prashant is referring to, specifically. Could be both that I messed up and that I look like a bum.
There, that post was hardly worth the electrons used to transmit it.